Connect with us

Governing Bodies

FLASHBACK: FIFA FINES NIGERIA FOR WITHDRAWAL FROM WORLD CUP

Published

on

BY KUNLE SOLAJA.

On this date, 20 July 1965, the World football governing body, FIFA slammed a 5,000 Swiss Francs on Nigeria for a sudden withdrawal from the 1966 World Cup which finals took place in England.

In the preliminary competition, Nigeria along with 14 other African teams entered. At the time, both Africa and Asia had one joint slot at the World Cup. The winner of the continental series in Africa was to face that of Asia to be able to qualify for the final tournament.

While Africa had 15 entries, Asia had just two who were to contest with Australia from Oceania and South Africa, which opted for the zone on political ground.

FIFA reasoned that the half allocation to both Asia and Africa was occasioned by the fact that the two continents did not have teams that qualified for Sweden 1958 and Chile 1962.

Advertisement
Letter written to the NFA after withdrawal from 1966 World Cup

The 15 teams in Africa were divided into six groups of either two or three teams.

Nigeria was grouped with Libya and United Arab Republic (Egypt/Syria) in Group 6.

The six group winners were to move into round two with the following pairings: Group 1 to face Group 5 while Group 2 winners were to face that of Group 4.

The Nigeria’s group winner was to face the eventual champion of Group 3, which had Algeria, Liberia and Tunisia.

But the matches did not hold in Africa following a mass boycott. First to withdraw on 17 August 1964 were Morocco and Ethiopia.

Then on 21 September 1964, the quartet of Guinea, Ghana, Senegal and Tunisia joined. On 8 October 1964, South Africa, based on protest to FIFA by Egypt (then UAR), was also thrown out.

Advertisement

It was on that day that Nigeria and all the remaining African countries announced their withdrawal from participating in the World Cup 1966 qualifiers.

Also, Syria, which had pulled out of an earlier political union of UAR withdrew from Europe Group 9 where it was to compete.

Asia’s four teams had their fair share of controversy too.

The league-styled games were to be played on a neutral ground, Japan.

South Africa was banned by FIFA on account of apartheid policy.

Advertisement

That left three teams to contest. South Korea also withdrew when the tournament was moved from Japan to Cambodia.

On account of North Korea not having diplomatic relationship with most Asian countries, it was difficult finding a suitable country to host the tournament until North Korean leader, Kim II-Sung convinced his Cambodian ally to host the matches.

That left only Australia and North Korea to play in duels easily won by North Korea.

For the final round, North Korea were to play the three final group winners from Africa on home and away basis with the winning side of the quartet qualifying for England ’66.

Because of the withdrawal of the African teams, North Korea qualified automatically.

Advertisement

FIFA, in its reaction to the boycotts, fined the boycotting countries including Nigeria.

In the letter sent to Nigeria and dated 20 July 1965, FIFA stated that Nigeria breached the competition’s regulations by withdrawing after the preliminary competition had started.

The NFA was given a deadline of 31 December 1965 to pay the fine.

Kunle Solaja is the author of landmark books on sports and journalism as well as being a multiple award-winning journalist and editor of long standing. He is easily Nigeria’s foremost soccer diarist and Africa's most capped FIFA World Cup journalist, having attended all FIFA World Cup finals from Italia ’90 to Qatar 2022. He was honoured at the Qatar 2022 World Cup by FIFA and AIPS.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Governing Bodies

Motsepe Orders CAF Reforms After AFCON Morocco 2025 Final Controversy

Published

on

The Confederation of African Football (CAF is set to review its disciplinary code following the incidents that attended the final match of the 2025 Africa Cup of Nations and the backlash that attended the decisions of the disciplinary committee.  

CAF president Dr Patrice Motsepe, in a statement released this weekend, has restated the continental body’s firm commitment to safeguarding the integrity, reputation and global competitiveness of African football, following the controversial incidents that marred the Final of the Africa Cup of Nations Morocco 2025.

Motsepe described the scenes at the AFCON final as “unacceptable,” admitting he was “extremely disappointed” by events that detracted from Africa’s flagship football competition. While acknowledging the rulings announced on Wednesday, January 28, 2026, by the CAF Disciplinary Board, the CAF president stressed that he respects the independence of CAF’s judicial structures and will fully comply with their decisions.

“I am absolutely determined, and the CAF Executive Committee (EXCO), as well as the Presidents of our 54 Member Associations, are also determined, to maintain and advance the integrity, reputation and global competitiveness of African football and CAF competitions,” Motsepe said.

In response to the fallout from the AFCON final, Motsepe confirmed that he has convened a meeting of the CAF Executive Committee, which is the highest decision-making body in CAF outside the Annual Ordinary General Assembly.

Advertisement

The meeting is to conduct a comprehensive review of CAF regulations, including the CAF Disciplinary Code. The aim, he explained, is to ensure that CAF’s judicial bodies are adequately empowered to impose “appropriate and dissuasive sanctions” for serious breaches of CAF statutes, regulations and conduct that damages the image of African football.

Beyond disciplinary reforms, Motsepe highlighted ongoing efforts to strengthen officiating standards across the continent. He noted that CAF has made “significant improvements” in recent years in the quality, independence and professionalism of African referees, VAR operators and match commissioners, adding that further investments, both financial and technical, will be made to elevate them to the highest global standards.

“One of the first changes I introduced as CAF President was to ensure that the CAF Referees Committee is independent and impartial, with members proposed by our 54 Member Associations and drawn from the most qualified and respected referees in Africa,” he said.

Motsepe emphasised that African match officials must not only be competent but also be widely perceived as fair, impartial and world-class.

Expressing optimism about the future, the CAF president concluded that with the new reforms and enhanced measures, African football will continue to grow in stature and credibility on the global stage.

Advertisement

“I am confident that African football and CAF competitions will continue to be respected, admired and counted among the best in the world,” he said.

Join the Sports Village Square channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H

Continue Reading

Governing Bodies

CAS grants stay on FIFA ban for seven naturalised footballers, Malaysian association says

Published

on

Copa Libertadores - Round of 16 - Second Leg - Velez Sarsfield v Fortaleza - Estadio Jose Amalfitani, Buenos Aires, Argentina - August 19, 2025 Velez Sarsfield's Imanol Machuca in action REUTERS/Pedro Lazaro Fernandez/File Photo

Seven naturalised players in Malaysia’s national football team have obtained a reprieve from the Court of Arbitration for Sport, halting their 12-month suspension from all football-related activities, the Football Association of Malaysia (FAM) said on Tuesday.

FIFA suspended the seven naturalised players for 12 months and fined FAM 350,000 Swiss francs ($439,257) in September last year after finding that doctored documentation had been used to allow the players to participate in an Asian Cup qualifier against Vietnam.

FAM then took the case to CAS after FIFA dismissed its appeal. FIFA said it would launch a formal probe into the association’s internal operations and would notify authorities in five countries of potential criminal proceedings.

The players who were granted the reprieve were Facundo Garcés, Rodrigo Holgado, Imanol Machuca, João Figueiredo, Gabriel Palmero, Jon Irazabal and Héctor Hevel.

“This decision means that the 12-month suspension from all football activities imposed by FIFA on the seven players is temporarily suspended, and they are allowed to continue their careers and participate in any football-related activities until a final decision on the appeal at CAS is made,” FAM said on its Facebook account.

Advertisement

Following the document forgery scandal, FIFA overturned the results of three matches involving Malaysia after ruling that they had fielded these ineligible players.

The scandal drew criticism in Malaysia, with fans and several lawmakers calling for action to be taken against FAM as well as the government agencies responsible for granting citizenship to the players.

Malaysia’s Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim had vowed transparency in domestic investigations into the alleged forgery, but stressed that FAM should be allowed to defend itself.

-Reuters

 

Advertisement

Join the Sports Village Square channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H

Continue Reading

Governing Bodies

Pinnick at the Global Table: Nigeria’s Voice Heard at FIFA Deliberations in Doha

Published

on

In the hushed corridors and high-ceilinged meeting rooms of Doha, where global football policy is debated long before it is felt on the pitch, Amaju Melvin Pinnick took his place among the game’s most influential decision-makers on Tuesday.

The former President of the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) and current Deputy Chairperson of the FIFA Men’s National Team Competitions Committee featured prominently at the FIFA Plenary Session and Committee Meetings held in the Qatari capital — a gathering that brought together senior football administrators from across continents to shape the future of international football.

It was a moment of high-level deliberations, where discussions ranged from the structure and calendar of men’s national team competitions to broader strategic policies affecting FIFA tournaments worldwide.

At the centre of those conversations sat Pinnick, one of Africa’s most visible football administrators of the past decade, continuing Nigeria’s representation at the sport’s most powerful table.

The Doha meetings underlined the growing importance of collaborative governance in an increasingly congested global football calendar. With national teams, clubs and confederations navigating competing interests, FIFA’s Men’s National Team Competitions Committee plays a pivotal role in aligning policy with practicality — from qualification pathways to tournament formats and scheduling frameworks.

Pinnick’s presence at the session was not merely ceremonial. As a committee leader, he participated in deliberations that will influence how national teams prepare, qualify and compete in FIFA tournaments in the coming years. His involvement reflects a continuity of influence built during his tenure at the NFF, when Nigeria regained visibility and credibility within global football governance structures.

Advertisement

For Nigeria, the optics and substance of Pinnick’s role in Doha matter. In an era when representation often translates into influence, having a Nigerian administrator actively engaged in FIFA’s decision-making processes reinforces the country’s standing beyond results on the field. It also highlights Africa’s broader contribution to shaping global football policy, rather than merely responding to decisions taken elsewhere.

The Doha meetings also served as a reminder of FIFA’s increasingly global outlook, with Qatar — fresh from hosting the 2022 World Cup — continuing to position itself as a hub for international football diplomacy. Against that backdrop, Pinnick’s participation symbolised the intersection of experience, continuity and continental representation.

As the sessions concluded, the outcomes may not yet be visible to fans, but their impact will eventually be felt in future tournaments, qualification systems and competition structures. For now, Nigeria’s seat at the table — occupied by one of its most prominent football administrators — remains firmly secured.

In Doha, amid policy papers and strategic frameworks, Amaju Pinnick’s presence spoke quietly but clearly: Nigeria is still part of the conversation shaping world football’s next chapter.

Join the Sports Village Square channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Most Viewed