Connect with us

Olympics

OLYMPIC AND WORLD CHAMPIONS AMONG RUSSIAN ATHLETES BANNED AFTER CAS RULING

Published

on

BY DUNCAN MACKAY 

 

A group of 12 Russian athletes, including the 2012 Olympic high jump champion Ivan Ukhov, have been suspended for periods ranging from two to eight years after the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) ruled against them.

The athletes banned also included Svetlana Shkolina, winner of the high jump at the 2013 International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) World Championships and the bronze medallist at London 2012. 

It is the first case of CAS issuing disciplinary procedures since it replaced the Russian Athletics Federation (RusAF) in hearing cases following their suspension by the IAAF. 

The cases are based mainly upon evidence gathered by Canadian lawyer Richard McLaren and the the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU). 

Advertisement

The cases “against several Russian athletes, in particular to the effect that these athletes participated in and/or benefited from anabolic steroid doping programmes and benefited from specific protective methods (washout schedules) in the period 2012 (Olympic Games in London) – 2013 (World Championships in Moscow),” CAS said in a statement today. 

This method was invented by Grigory Rodchenkov, the former director of the Moscow Laboratory, who claims he invented a fast-acting steroid “cocktail” that could be swished orally and would “wash out” of athletes’ systems quickly.

Rodchenkov has claimed he came up with the scheme of the Government in Moscow before fleeing the country to the United States, where he later became the main whistle blower for authorities investigating allegations of Russian state-sponsored doping. 

A full list of the 12 Russian athletes banned by the Court of Arbitration for Sport ©CAS

A full list of the 12 Russian athletes banned by the Court of Arbitration for Sport today ©CAS

The decision means that Ukhov is set to be stripped of the Olympic gold medal he won at London 2012.

That is now set to be the United States’ Erik Kynard.

Advertisement

Three athletes shared the bronze – Qatar’s Mutaz Essa Barshim, Canada’s Derek Drouin and Britain’s Robbie Grabarz – meaning they will all be upgraded to silver.

Ukhov has been given a four-year ban starting from today and all his results from July 16 in 2012 retrospectively annulled.

Among other medals he is set to lose is the silver he won at the 2014 IAAF World Indoor Championships in Sopot.

He also currently heads this year’s IAAF world indoor rankings with a best jump of 2.31 metres at Chelyabinsk on January 17. 

Shkolina had won the gold medal at the IAAF World Championships in Moscow 2013, a year after finishing third at London 2012.

Advertisement

She will now be stripped of both of those medals, with her gold medal from Moscow set to be awarded to America’s Brigetta Barrett. 

Spain’s Ruth Beitia is likely to be upgraded from fourth place to the bronze medal at London 2012. 

Another significant name among those announced today is Tatyana Lysenko, winner of the gold medal in hammer at London 2012 but which she had already been stripped of in October 2016 following a re-test of her sample by the IOC.

She is now also set to lose the gold medal she won at the 2013 IAAF World Championships in Moscow, which is set to be awarded to Poland’s Anita Włodarczyk with China’s Zhang Wenxiu and Wang Zhengmoving up to silver and bronze respectively. 

Lysenko has also been banned for eight years having already received a two-year doping suspension in 2008. 

Russia have now been stripped of a total of 15 medals from London 2012 – five gold, eight silver and two bronze. 

Advertisement

Lyukman Adams, a triple jumper who won the gold medal at the IAAF World Indoor Championships in Sopot, has also been banned.

Cubans Ernesto Revé and Pedro Pablo Pichardo are now set to be promoted to the silver and gold medals with Romania’s Marian Oprea moving from fourth to bronze. 

Vera Karmishina-Ganeeva, gold medallist in the discus at the 2013 Summer Universiade, has also been banned for two-years and had her results from July 2012 retrospectively stripped. 

“Today’s CAS rulings confirm that the evidence underlying the McLaren Reports is reliable and is capable of establishing anti-doping rule violations,” Brett Clothier, head of the AIU, said

“It needs to be noted that some of these cases were fought solely on the basis of the McLaren evidence, while others were combined with analytical evidence gathered through retesting. 

Advertisement

“It is very encouraging for us and gives us the possibility to pursue more cases in the future.”

It could have a potentially significant impact on cases involving data from the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) gathered from the Moscow Laboratory and using the underlying analytical data generated that the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) is currently in the process of authenticating.

“The AIU is in contact with WADA and is keeping a close eye on developments,” Clothier said. 

“We will wait for more information concerning the practical aspects of the sharing of the athletics- specific data from WADA and decide on the need for any further re-analysis or investigation that may be required in order to pursue more cases.”

The disqualification by CAS of Tatyana Firova, second right, means three of the four Russian runners who won the Olympic silver medal in the 4x400m at London 2012 have now been disqualified for doping

Other athletes among banned by CAS include Tatyana Firova, who becomes the third member of Russia’s 4×400 metre relay team that finished second at London 2012 to have been banned for doping.

They had originally won the silver medals behind the US but were stripped of them in November 2017 following positive re-tests of Yuliya Gushchina and Antonina Krivoshapka. 

Advertisement

Firova has received a four-year ban. 

A precedent for banning the Russian athletes was set in October 2017 when CAS ruled that Russian triple jumper Anna Pyatykh had used banned substances based on records of secret drug testing in 2013 following a case bought by the AIU. 

Documents leaked by Rodchenkov mentioned Pyatykh as part of a “washout” scheme, with unofficial internal testing finding four banned substances in the run-up to the 2013 IAAF World Championships.

It was no surprise that WADA hailed the verdict to ban the 12 athletes and also claimed that it justified their decision to reinstate the Russian Anti-Doping Agency, allowing them to access to the Moscow Laboratory.

“These decisions come as welcome news for athletes, anti-doping organizations, WADA and all others around the world who care about clean sport,” said WADA director general Olivier Niggli. 

Advertisement

“This should serve to reassure athletes that a lot of work is being conducted behind the scenes by various organisations that are committed to ensure that justice is rendered. 

“It reinforces the importance of ensuring that due process is followed and that evidence is carefully presented.

“This highlights also, once again, just how important the successful retrieval of the analytical data from the former Moscow Laboratory by WADA last month is for clean sport and reinforces the decision taken by the WADA Executive Committee to reinstate as compliant the Russian Anti-Doping Agency under strict conditions, including access to the data. 

“This large amount of data, which would not have been retrieved without that September ExCo decision, is currently being verified and assessed and, if found to be authentic, will be used to bring forward more cases against those who cheated.”

  • Insidethegames.biz

Kunle Solaja is the author of landmark books on sports and journalism as well as being a multiple award-winning journalist and editor of long standing. He is easily Nigeria’s foremost soccer diarist and Africa's most capped FIFA World Cup journalist, having attended all FIFA World Cup finals from Italia ’90 to Qatar 2022. He was honoured at the Qatar 2022 World Cup by FIFA and AIPS.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Olympics

This is my story: Odegbami on how he is stranded in London

Published

on

BY SEGUN ODEGBAMI, LONDON

Cancelled Eurostar train services from London to Paris, and other local services within France, have left hundreds of thousands of attendees of the Paris Olympic Games in the limbo of uncertainty. 

Even as I am also stranded until the security measures are lifted, there are ‘eyes’ over the Olympics and the city of Paris that reveal that the excitement over, probably, the most romantic Olympic Games in history, is unscathed, buzzing and alive all over France. 

The Falcons of Nigeria played against Brazil yesterday and lost. They play again on Sunday in Nantes! Life goes on! 

On ‘90 mins with Mathematical’ tomorrow morning I shall chat with Dr. Vincent  Okumagba, Chairman of Super Eaglesl Supporters Club, in Nantes; and Aramide, a former diplomat and a Nigerian resident in Paris, on the first days of Paris 2024! 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Olympics

Host club at Super Falcons’ Olympic match venue, Bordeaux is bankrupt

Published

on

 General view inside the Bordeaux stadium where Super Falcons played against Brazil REUTERS/Stephane Mahe/File Photo

After their lone goal loss to Brazil in their Group C opener of the Olympic Games, Super Falcons leave Bordeaux today for Nantes.

The host club of Bordeaux, FC Girondins de Bordeaux have filed for bankruptcy. This is coming just days after they were relegated to the third tier of French football after Liverpool soccer club’s owner withdrew from takeover talks, the former Ligue 1 club said on Thursday.

Earlier this month the six-times French champions were demoted from Ligue 2 by the National Directorate of Management Control due to financial concerns.

Once Liverpool’s owner, Fenway Sports Group, pulled out from takeover talks, it effectively ended the club’s survival hopes.

“It’s a difficult decision that anticipates an inevitable consequence of the restructuring process underway,” the club said in a statement.

Advertisement

Bordeaux will also abandon their professional status they have held since 1937 and close their renowned training academy, which has helped to develop players such as Bixente Lizarazu, Jules Kounde, and Zinedine Zidane.

Continue Reading

Olympics

What are Nigeria’s expectations at Paris 2024?

Published

on

Exactly one week ago this Friday, it was 72 years since Nigeria debuted at the Olympic Games in Helsinki. Since that July 19  date in 1952, Nigeria has featured in every edition of the Summer Olympic Games except that of Montreal in 1976 which the country boycotted along with some African and Asian countries.

Paris 2024 is therefore Nigeria’s 18th outing. What are the expectations of Nigeria? The desire to compete; the skills to excel, the courage to overcome and the strength to believe are the qualities of true sportsmen and great Olympians.

These are what Sports Village Square expects from Team Nigeria as Paris 2024 officially opens this Friday.

Sadly, the qualities articulated above are not well reflected in Nigeria’s participation in the Olympic Games, where the country appears just to make up the numbers.

No conscious effort to surpass previous marks. Hence, the country cannot look back to many memorable achievements in what is universally acknowledged as the greatest show on earth.

Nigeria obviously does not rank among the super powers in the Olympics and also not among the best ranked African countries at the Games.

Advertisement

These are the pictures Team Nigeria must strive to wipe off at the Paris 2024. 

Somehow, Nigeria’s performances since Helsinki Games in 1952 have not reflected the spirit of the Olympic Games’ Motto: Citius – Altius – Fortius (Swifter – Higher -Stronger).

Sports Village Square’s study of Nigeria’s participation at the Olympics shows that a poor one often follows a fair outing.

Perhaps, few examples are necessary. The bronze medal that Nojeem Maiyegun won at the 1964 Tokyo Games was followed by a fruitless outing at the 1968 Games in Mexico.

After another bronze medal by Isaac Ikhouria at the Munich 1972 Games, Nigeria had a scandalous and barren-medal outing at the next appearance – the Moscow 1980 Games.  

Advertisement

No medal was won at the 1988 Games after the lone silver and bronze medals at the Los Angeles 1984. The trend only changed when in Atlanta ’96, with two gold a silver and three bronze medals, proved a better outing than the preceding Barcelona ’92.

Yet the feat at Atlanta could not be matched at the Sydney 2000. Athens 2004 proved a return to the sad old cycle as Nigeria won just two bronze medals.

After the Barcelona ’92 Olympics, the nation went into jubilation over the four medal count achieved. A good result it was when compared with past achievements since the Helsinki 1952 debut.

The four-medal count comprising a bronze and three silver medals brought Nigeria’s count in 11 editions to eight medals. With medals of 1964, 1972, 1984, 1992 and 2004 added up, they are a mere fraction of what Kenya won at the Seoul 1988 Olympics alone.

The East Africans who have a fair control of the endurance races had a haul of five gold, two silver and two bronze medals at the Seoul 1988 Games.

Advertisement

Since 2000 Games, Nigeria has not won an Olympic gold medal.  The three silver and two bronze medals achievement at Beijing 2008, which were an improvement on the two bronze medals at Athens 2004 was immediately followed by a barren outing at London 2012.

At Rio 2016, Nigeria returned with just a bronze medal. That single bronze medal completes Nigeria’s cycle of fluctuating fortunes. It is time to put an end to this.

One step towards achieving this is to glean intelligent reports that could aid better performances for Team Nigeria at the Olympics.

Allen Dulles, the CIA Director during the celebrated Bay of Pigs episode in the near war between US and Cuba in the early 1960s, remarked that “intelligence is probably the least understood and most misrepresented of the diplomatic profession.”

In short, he meant to say that all nations spy. One can add that sports teams also spy at potential and actual opponents.

Advertisement

Even though espionage is often linked with sinister activities, to those in international relations, this is a misconception. A bit of spying is necessary to adjust to the right situations if one is to achieve the best possible goal.

This is in sports as it is in relations among nations. Intelligent reports are gleaned on other contestants and opponents – both actual and potential.

This is what Team Nigeria appears yet to employ in place of shooting-in-dark approach in preparation for multi-discipline games. We should ask ourselves the salient question: what do others do that make them table-toppers always.

To achieve the status of an Olympic contender requires long and dedicated training. The burning desire to excel over others creates a champion.

Countries that have succeeded at the Olympics put up serious long and short-term planning. Nigeria’s preparation for most Games is often towards the commencement of the sporting fiestas. Olympic champions are not made that way.

Advertisement

One recalls the Barcelona ’92 Olympics, the very first that this reporter attended.

US at the games, topped the medals’ chart and in spite of the country’s upswing and a total medal count of 108 – the third highest in the games’ history at the time, – the Americans were worried that the figures could be misleading.

They were conscious that over half of their medals came from athletics and swimming out of the 22 sports entered for. They began a review of strategies to be employed at future games. They planned to upgrade other sports federations.

Still making Barcelona ‘92 a focal point, one recalls the situation regarding Spain, a nation not rated among the super athletics performers.

At Barcelona ’92 Games, their 22-medal count was a result of a four-year programme in which $120 million was spent on competitors and coaches.

Advertisement

The programme was aimed at changing Spain’s poor sports image. At the preceding Seoul ’88 Games, Spain won pitiable four medals. They went to the drawing board. “We wanted to give the world an image of Spain’s dynamic and modern trend, not only for folklore”, said the then sports minister, Hanvier Navarro, at a press conference at the close of Barcelona ’82.

For Spain, more than a dozen of coaches were imported from Cuba and the western bloc. They came as teachers in boxing, volleyball, archery, cycling etc.

They coached over 800 athletes who got subsidy of $80,000 a year for four years. In addition, a one million dollar pension scheme from a Spanish bank was planned for each gold medallist when he clocked 50. The money reportedly came from an insurance policy with an American firm which was to pay for each medal.

Such direct aid to sports is what Nigerian sports deserve to make great impact and produce great Olympians.

It is pertinent to find out how Australia managed to improve on their medals count over many Olympic Games. At Seoul ’88 for instance, Australia had 14 medals which progressively improved to 27 at Barcelona ’92, 41 at Atlanta ’96 and 58 at Sydney 2000.

Advertisement

At Athens 2004, their medal count was 49, though a drop from the previous 58, the Australians up till Tokyo 2020 have managed to be in the top 10 bracket of the final medals tables.

Australia is taken as a case study since using US, Russia and China may be going to the extreme owing to their overwhelming control of the Olympic Games final medals tables.

A study of organisation and funding of sports in Australia showed that the Australian Sports Institute awarded 600 scholarships a year and funded full-time coaches.

The Australian Institute of Sport is a high performance sports training institution. Since being established in 1981, it has seen the country shooting up in the Olympics medals tables.

If we may ask: what has become of Nigeria’s National Institute of Sports established about the same time as that of Australia?

Advertisement

Nigeria’s low performance at the Olympics may have also stemmed from the fact that the country is not taking advantage of its natural endowments.

One wonders why Nigeria has not considered investing in swimmers and aquatic-based athletes from the Niger Delta Region where water is their natural habitat.

The region should be producing not just gold medal winners in Africa, but also contenders at the Olympic and Commonwealth Games.

The multinational oil firms that impaired on the people’s natural economic activities and also made swimming impossible in the region can contribute in raising athletes and funding the maintenance of pools.

The control of the overall medals tables at African Games and the Olympics is mainly from the water-based sports. This will help to revive the latent talents in swimming which always account for the bulk of medals in most Games.

Advertisement

We have a choice to make whether to win few medals in the popular sports, or go for the lesser-known ones which fetch more medals and impart more on the overall tables.

Canoeing, may be a way of life in the river-side areas of Nigeria, but as a sport, it is insignificant. But the relatively unknown Nigerians won four gold medals for the country in this unrated sports discipline in the country at the Rabat 2019 African Games.

Imagine the return on investment on the two athletes, Ayomide Bello and Goodness Foloki that won the four medals.

This brings to the fore, the application of the principle of comparative advantage in sports. As in international trade, Nigeria should look into those sports, even if not popular, that are indigenous to its citizens to make marks in multi-discipline games.

We have seen our strength in wrestling and weightlifting. These are not popular sports by Nigerians’ reckoning, but they brought glory.

Advertisement

The US, China and Russia that always top medals tables at the Olympics don’t rely on football or any other team event that only contribute to shooting up contingents’ sizes and expenditure without having corresponding impact on overall medal achievements.

Archery, canoeing, rowing, diving and equestrian sports among others are indigenous to some parts of Nigeria and the indigenes are naturally endowed.

Canoeing for instance, is part of normal life in the riverside areas. We saw what we did in that sport at Rabat 2019 where Nigeria won four gold medals to be second to South Africa that had eight.

Investing in that sport may breed future Olympic champions. Archery and horsemanship are indigenous to the North.

If the Tony Ikazoboh’s proposal of decentralising sports federations instead of their clustering in the federal capital is accepted; an association for archery and equestrian sports should be located in the North where talents abound.  While swimming federation should be located in the South South.

Advertisement

Walking has become a way of life in Nigeria. With proper teaching of the rules, talents for the Olympic Games will not be in short supply in Lagos area and other urban centres where chaotic transport system has created the enabling environment for prospective Olympic medallists in walking.

In summary, Nigeria should make concrete efforts at identifying the reasons why other countries perform well at the Olympics and how the country too can excel.

Continue Reading

Most Viewed